Wind Power: Facts & Fairytales
By Specificity
Congress and the President have dedicated hundreds of millions of dollars in their economic stimulus spending bill on wind power. Of all the possibilities for renewable energy, wind power is one of the most popular with the public, the most touted by Congress, and the least likely to have any effect on either energy output or reduction in carbon emissions. In this article, I'll go out on a limb, and splash cold water on the pipe dream that is utility-scale wind power.
Utility-scale wind power is NOT residential-scale wind power. We are not talking about individuals owning and maintaining small turbines to reduce their energy consumption from the grid. What we are discussing here is the construction of huge wind farms that are attached not to individual users, but to the nation's electrical grid and are supposed to supply clean wholesale power.
Spinning Reserve
When the wind reaches a productive speed on a utility-scale wind farm, the power companies switch from their base load plants (coal, natural gas, nuclear) to the wind. The problem is, base load plants cannot quickly be powered down or ramped up; they continue operating in what is called spinning reserve. While in spinning reserve, they burn nearly as much input energy to produce nothing as they do when producing electricity. Base load plants remain in spinning reserve because no one knows when the wind will stop blowing and the base load plants will need to be brought back online.
Batteries Not Included
Electricity is a unique commodity in that, for most part, it must be produced at the exact moment of consumption. Therefore, the wizards that control our nation's energy supply are constantly adjusting their output to the current demands being placed on the grid. This requires planning and the wind cannot be scheduled. Hydroelectric dams can be scheduled by controlling water flow and building potential energy behind the dam to be released at peak demand. Photovoltaic cells in the desert can be counted on for a certain level of production during daylight hours. What wind farms need to work is a way to store the power produced so that it can be released at a scheduled time, but a battery large enough to accommodate grid storage does not exist.
There are some methods of storing wind energy. One way is to use wind turbines to pump water behind a hydroelectric dam. Another way is to use them to compress air into an underground mine shaft (Wikipedia: Grid Storage). At peak demand time, the air can be heated with propane and used to spin turbines to produce electricity. These types of storage require unique sites that have both heavy winds and the other required geographical features. Therefore, this is not a large scale solution.
Residential Use
Individuals who live in terrain that meet the requirements can build their own wind turbines. The battery pack required to load-level for a home is fairly small and the waste of generating electricity far from the consumer is eliminated (Chautauqua Wind Power). Also currently being discussed in New York City is the possibility of putting wind turbines atop skyscrapers. If designed on a small scale concept where that power is used by the building holding the wind turbine, this is workable. If they are merely attached to the grid, they are no different or more effective than large wind farms.
Follow the Money
As is often the case with government subsidized projects, the economics of wind energy are neither market-based nor logical. Without the hand of government, wind farms would not be built. First, they do not make economic sense. A plant in spinning reserve produces as much pollution and costs as much to run as a plant online. Therefore, the cost of wind energy is the cost of the equipment and maintenance of the wind farm plus the cost of running the base load plant that was online before the wind started to blow. To relieve this cost, government subsidizes the building of wind farms. Subsidies are required whenever what's being produced does not have enough economic value to generate demand. In addition to subsidy, government then generates demand by requiring fixed percentages of power produced to be from "renewable sources."
Other Problems
Actual energy output promised by developers is not always what is produced. When advertised, wind turbine output is sold to the public often at assumed wind speeds of 28-30mph. These winds are uncommon and because of the physics of wind power generation, cutting the wind speed in half reduces the output of the turbine by a factor of 8. In other words, a turbine advertised to produce 1.6 megawatts at 30mph will only produce .20 megawatts at 15mph. Here it is on paper demonstrated with a small turbine (hat tip: Energy Self Sufficiency Newsletter):
Some people claim health problems from the low-frequency noise generated from wind farms. There are enough claims to warrant further study on how far these farms need to be set back from residential areas. Also, if the sounds do affect people, they most certainly affect wildlife and may drive mammals away from the site. Wind turbine blades cannot be seen by bats and are referred to by the Audubon Society as "condor Cuisinarts." None of these are a problem when wind power is restricted to small-scale use where a smaller navigable airspace is occupied by turbine blades and there is no low-freq noise.
Wind Farms and Health Issues
Conclusion
Wind farms are not about "green" energy; they are about business. Companies make millions selling something that the market does not want (because it has no economic value) but must buy (because government mandates it). Since there is no economic value, government must subsidize the farms making the taxpayer, in effect, pay for the same electricity twice, once in taxes and one in our utility bill.
No power plant anywhere has ever been decommissioned because it was replaced by wind power. If Congress and the President wish to focus on workable wind power, then the focus should either be on new technology for grid storage, or tax breaks for small-scale wind turbines. Building utility scale wind farms on our current grid is nothing but political masturbation; it feels good to do it, but it accomplishes nothing.
Reader Poll!
Has this article affected your view of wind energy?
See results without votingComments
Lots of people using residential wind power in various parts of the country (as opposed to one single wind farm) would mean that some percentage of those wind turbines would always be running. That would cause a predictable reduction in demand being placed on the grid, resulting in less fossil fuel input.
Energy sold back to the power company is just used by the power company to toward their renewable energy requirement and does not effect fossil fuel input. Nonetheless, for the reason pointed out above, residential wind power is currently more effective than utility scale windpower and will remain so until grid-level storage is possible.
Let it be known that I am letting your comment stand even though it appears to be a commercial for the Windspire.
I see your an accountant.
Based on that and your hub I tend to believe you! I believe you when you say,this is just government masterbation of money they give to their campaign contributors,favors for a favor .There is a lot more masterbating of government money going on ,that you may or maynot know about.HUD- housing and urban development is a big one (pun intended).the department of defense is involved with the accounting end of it.You may want to google Catherine Austin Fitts a former HUD Honcho,She has a website that has the dirt on the sham going on there.Carbon tax is probably another.From past
news on government "con"-tracts more than likely all government contracts are given out with strings attached ,and additional money,ajusting for materbation,oh sorry I mean "INFLATION" LOL !
I did not think of it as a commercial, My bad. I just thought that it was a very efficient new type of wind power generator. My son's school put one in after much research. I agree that the government does things that sound good on the surface just to placate people. Like the whole ethanol thing. When the governor of MO. put mandatory ethanol into effect, no surprise that his brother was already staged to clean up with the whole business.
PaperMoon: Thanks for explaining your post. The Windspire does sound like a cool system.
Someonewhoknows: Nice punnery.
Both of you: You're both right about gov't setting up friends to clean up on feel-good projects. In corporate America, this would be called insider trading, but in DC, it's business as usual for both parties. Thanks!!
You have ignored the effects of a supegrid as a way of taking away the unreliability of wind power. In some scientific scenarios it has been shown that if you have a very large supergrid on a continental scale with widely distributed windfarms both on land and offshore you can have very reliable wind power. The problem is depending on just a single site or turbine. I would like to refer you to Dr. Gregor Czisch's work on supergrids and wind power. In this scenarios it is possible to generate upto 70% of electricity using wind power alone and the remaining 30% as a backup. In a supergrid the problem you refer to of spinning reserve will not apply.
I will look further into the supergrid concept, but my immediate question would be how to make it usable across national borders.
Supergrid seems to make sense from a "reliability" (a crucial factor in utilities parlance) standpoint, but at what cost? Will we have a landscape left? A state that has set a goal of say, 15,000 MW of wind-generated electricity will need to erect 7000 to 10,000 of these 50 story gyrating skyscrapers. Think about that. And to harness the best wind, they need to be sited on our most treasured natural landmarks. This includes devastating desecration of ridgelines, forests, waterways, etc. To amass the necessary turbines to make a super-grid viable, I assert that nobody would live here anymore. Give me fifty acres of brownfield hosting a nuke plant rather than the thousands of acres of pristine wildlands needed to produce the same (albeit less reliable) amount of wind power. The country is truly hysterical over this movement, and I thank you for pointing out the emperor's lack of new clothes.
Very informative. Seriously, I had no idea about utility-grade windmill farms not being all that great, when look at the other factors. Maybe someday it'll be valuable. I'm still interested in personal windmill options and would like to learn more.
Paper Moon 3 years ago
Not sure about the commercial aspects. I do know that if you have the propper set up in your home, and produce more than you use, you can sell the extra energy back out to the electic company. So would it not be possible to supliment the big companies with wind energy with out them shutting down (going on stand by)?
As far as residential wind energy, the Mariah Windspire captures breezes at 30 feet and below with a design in which blades run up a pole's length and spin around it. Contoured airfoils make the Windspire the first vertical-axis turbine that can start in slow winds without help from a motor or inefficient scoops or wings.